Robotic-assisted surgery and the NOSE technique in the treatment of colorectal endometriosis
https://doi.org/10.63769/3033-6392-2026-1-1-77-84
Abstract
Background. Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) is an innovative technique of endoscopic surgery in which with specimen extraction through the natural orifice. The relevance of studying robot-assisted colorectal NOSE resection is driven by the need for an objective assessment of its advantages and safety.
Aim. To evaluate the safety and short-term clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted bowel resections with specimen extraction through the anal canal in patients with colorectal endometriosis.
Materials and methods. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted based on the analysis of data from 66 patients with confirmed deep infiltrative colorectal endometriosis. All patients underwent robot-assisted colorectal NOSE resection.
Results. The mean age of the patients was 35.4 years (range 23 to 49 years). The mean body mass index was 23.36 kg/m2 (range 16.65 to 33.12 kg/m2). The mean operative time for robotic-assisted colorectal resection using the NOSE technique was 144.6 ± 50.1 min. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 124.6 ± 90.8 mL. On postoperative day 2, 13 patients presented with a body temperature elevation up to 38°C.
Conclusion. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy combined with the NOSE technique is a technically feasible, safe, and effective approach in the comprehensive surgical management of colorectal endometriosis. The technique offers several advantages: reduction in the consumption of disposable instruments, absence of a laparotomic incision, accelerated postoperative rehabilitation.
About the Authors
P. P. NefyodovRussian Federation
Pavel Petrovich Nefyodov
22a Pokrovka St., Moscow 101000
A. A. Popov
Russian Federation
22a Pokrovka St., Moscow 101000
A. A. Fedorov
Russian Federation
22a Pokrovka St., Moscow 101000
T. A. Glebov
Russian Federation
22a Pokrovka St., Moscow 101000
Yu. I. Sopova
Russian Federation
22a Pokrovka St., Moscow 101000
References
1. Chapron C., Fauconnier A., Vieira M. et al. Anatomical distribution of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: surgical implications and proposition for a classification. Hum Reprod 2003;18(1):157–61. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deg009
2. Burney R.O., Giudice L.C. Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2012;98(3):511–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.029
3. Becker C.M., Bokor A., Heikinheimo O. et al.; ESHRE Endometriosis Guideline Group. ESHRE guideline: endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open 2022;2022(2):hoac009. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoac009
4. Yong P.J., Bedaiwy M.A., Alotaibi F., Anglesio M.S. Pathogenesis of bowel endometriosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2021;71:2–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.05.009
5. Ceccaroni M., Ceccarello M., Raimondo I. et al. “A Space Odyssey” on laparoscopic segmental rectosigmoid resection for deep endometriosis: a seventeenyear retrospective analysis of outcomes and postoperative complications among 3050 patients treated in a referral center. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2023;30(8):652–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.04.005
6. Nezhat F.R., Sirota I. Perioperative outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopy surgery for advancedstage endometriosis. JSLS 2014;18(4):e2014.00094. DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00094
7. Siesto G., Ieda N., Rosati R., Vitobello D. Robotic surgery for deep endometriosis: a paradigm shift. Int J Med Robot 2014;10(2):140–6. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1518
8. Hur C., Falcone T. Robotic treatment of bowel endometriosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2021;71:129–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.05.012
9. Pellegrino A., Damiani G.R., Trio C. et al. Robotic shaving technique in 25 patients affected by deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectovaginal space. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015;22(7):1287–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.06.020
10. Mikhail E., Pavlovic Z.J., Al Jumaily M. et al. Robotassisted surgery for endometriosis current and future perspectives. Surg Technol Int 2022;40:197–202. DOI: 10.52198/22.STI.40.GY1562
11. Kar E., Philip C.E., Eskandar K. et al. Natural orifice specimen extraction as a promising alternative for minilaparotomy in bowel resection due to endometriosis: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2024;31(7):574–83.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.04.017
12. Grigoriadis G., Dennis T., Merlot B. et al. Natural orifice specimen extraction colorectal resection for deep endometriosis: a 50 case series. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2022;29(9):1054–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.05.009
13. Deng K., Li Y.R., Guo T.L. et al. Clinical efficacy analysis of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) in the treatment of rectal cancer: a singlecenter retrospective analysis. Tech Coloproctol 2025;29(1):140. DOI: 10.1007/s10151025031864
14. Haas E.M., de Paula T.R., LunaSaracho R. et al. The success rate of robotic natural orifice intracorporeal anastomosis and transrectal extraction (NICE procedure) in a large cohort of consecutive unselected patients. Surg Endosc 2023;37(1):683–91. DOI: 10.1007/s00464022097176
15. Popov A.A., Fedorov A.A., Sopova Yu.I. et al. Comparison of the main methods of surgical treatment of patients with colorectal endometriosis. Rossiysky vestnik akusheraginekologa = Russian Bulletin of ObstetricianGynecologist 2024;24(6):118–23. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/rosakush202424061118
16. Popov A.A., Fedorov A.A., Khabibullakh T. et al. Optimization of surgical treatment of patients with colorectal endometriosis using transluminal technology. Rossiysky vestnik akusheraginekologa = Russian Bulletin of ObstetricianGynecologist 2023;23(6):173–8. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/rosakush202323062173
17. Popov A.A., Khabibullakh T., Fedorov A.A. et al., inventors. Method for the treatment of colorectal endometriosis. RU patent 2,783,329. November 11, 2022. (In Russ., in English.)
18. Nefedov P.P., Mamedova S.G., Popov A.A., Glebov T.A. ICG technology in robotassisted surgery of colorectal endometriosis. Prakticheskaya meditsina = Practical medicine 2025;23(5):63–66
19. Abrão M.S., Petraglia F., Falcone T. et al. Deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectosigmoid: critical factors to consider before management. Hum Reprod Update 2015;21(3):329–39. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmv003
20. Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240(2): 205–13. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
21. Malzoni M., Di Giovanni A., Exacoustos C. et al. Feasibility and safety of laparoscopicassisted bowel segmental resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis: a retrospective cohort study with description of technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016;23(4):512–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.09.024
Review
For citations:
Nefyodov P.P., Popov A.A., Fedorov A.A., Glebov T.A., Sopova Yu.I. Robotic-assisted surgery and the NOSE technique in the treatment of colorectal endometriosis. Medical Robotics. 2026;1(1):77-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.63769/3033-6392-2026-1-1-77-84
JATS XML
